Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives

Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives

Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives

Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives

Understanding the Value and Trap of Free to Play Design

In my last post on free to play and mobile design, I talked about gacha and lootbox design. I also mentioned trying the game Arknights and how I was still in the honeymoon period…well, that is over, and it did not end well. For today, we are going to discuss the real wall of playing free to play games.

What Free to Play Values

As everyone knows, the lack of a paywall to get into a free to play game is a major attraction for people to try them out. Without it, designers need to find a way to generate revenue through the player base itself. Even though many mobile games will use ads, that is not the same as gacha and lootbox design as a way of keeping someone invested in playing.

The more addictive games know that if you want to keep someone playing (and hopefully turn them into whale) you need to get them invested, and to do that, you need to create value. A free to play game is not the same as a retail title whose initial paywall covers the investment on the player’s part. Obviously, we are ignoring retail games that have microtransactions for this discussion.

There are only two areas that are left to create investment in free to play games: Time and Money. Many years ago, Valve gave a talk at GDC about the two aspects when it came to Team Fortress 2 and how the game went free to play and generated revenue via the Mann Co store.

In that presentation, they spoke about the concepts of time and money, and how every player values them differently. For one person, they could play a game for hundreds of hours and will rebuke spending even one dollar to buy something; just as someone will happily spend hundreds of dollars if it means accomplishing months of tasks within minutes.

F2P designers have been courting both personalities for years. You can see similar elements across mobile titles: a massive in-game store and banners for people who value time; designing progress around repetitive tasks and grinding for those who value money.

There is nothing “stupid” or “lazy” as gamers have said about developers who make use of these tactics, they know what they are doing, and it is about generating the sunk cost fallacy.

Sunk Cost Fallacy

The sunk cost fallacy is a term used to describe that tendency for someone to keep investing in something due to already having done it before, hence the sunk cost. Free to play designers know that the goal is to get someone to spend money one time – even if it is just a dollar. Once someone has invested into a free to play game, they are more willing to do it again, and more importantly, keep playing.

When we usually talk about the sunk cost fallacy it has to do with spending money, as that is the popular interpretation, but this can also apply to time. For someone who does not want to spend money, there is always the option of spending time. Resources can be earned by repeating content already done, or constantly logging in to repeat a task.

In Arknights, characters require multiple resources to upgrade their various traits. If you do not spend money, you are going to have to repeat missions again and again for those items. Even putting the game at 2X speed, you are still waiting anywhere from one to four minutes watching a map on autopilot to collect said resources. Even though that does not sound like a long time, all those minutes do add up. Again, you are going to be doing this constantly, as said resources are not guaranteed drops, and you have at minimum 11 characters to do this for.

Every F2P game starts out easy to progress, but then puts up this wall as kind of a test to see if the player is invested in continuing to play (or pay). As we talked about in the piece on gacha design, it never truly ends.

From One Wall to the Next:

Supporters of F2P design will often say that skilled players do not need to spend money or are good enough at the game to make progress. Another aspect of F2P design not often discussed are the multiple walls of progress. Once you have spent enough money or time on a game to get past that initial wall, many basic tasks or challenges become easier.

During my time in Marvel Strike Force, I routinely earned free materials because my team was high enough to complete special challenges. Arknights features a similar philosophy with daily events whose reward goes up the harder the version you clear.

Breaking through that first wall of progress is like getting a massive weight off your shoulders, and is often that point where players become committed to a game. The sunk cost fallacy is in full effect: “I can’t stop playing, look at how far I’ve come.” And when the player gets committed to one aspect of a game, chances are they are going to commit to everything.

Providing free players with an early power boost is an effective way to start getting them invested in the game

Unfortunately, here is the dirty secret around monetized F2P design – there is always another wall. To keep making progress, you are going to need more resources and higher up characters, which you guess it, means more grinding or spending money.

A F2P game that runs out of grinding to do is a dead game, and why they are designed around long-term play and continued updates.

The beauty about scaling content is that there is no such thing as running out of numbers. Every free to play game imaginable has some system that could be extended indefinitely. In Marvel Strike Force, during my time playing the developers kept the rarity system, but raised the max level of characters to 75 instead of 70. Those five additional levels would cost about a million in terms of in-game currency to make that jump.

Not only that but for character-driven games there can be further grinding to unlock a character, and then restarting the grind for each new character the player unlocks.

Gameplay Hostage

What frustrates me as someone who understands game design is how many of the F2P games I’ve looked at have legitimately great systems to them, but as I said in my last post: A game that lives by its gacha design, can also die because of it.

The elements that I complain about: the grind, the repetitive nature, the lack of evolving game systems, those are intentional by the designers. With Arknights, I really like the idea of a character-driven tower defense game, but the elements surrounding that lead to frustration. What hurts the most is that these games are so tethered to their monetization systems, there is no way to make a “retail version” without requiring an entire redesign.

As I said in the previous piece that game titles that are tied to gacha or heavy monetization can live or die because of it. Somewhere, there must be a middle ground between a retail experience and the traditional monetized mobile games. After catching the developers of Arknights in a lie with how they give out premium currency, I have no intention of ever spending money in the game, and possibly just deleting it.

Before the pandemic scuttled all plans in 2020, there were talks about governments cracking down on F2P games in terms of their addictive nature. I have made a promise to myself that I outright refuse to play any videogame that demands my constant time or money to enjoy it. Personally, I think it is a matter of whennot if, for governments to talk about this again, and when that day comes, a lot of games (and their consumers) are going to be left scrambling.

If you enjoyed my post, consider joining the Game-Wisdom discord channel open to everyone.

Источник: []
, Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives

Disney Sells FoxNext Games Unit to Scopely

Disney has sold off FoxNext Games, the studio it obtained through the purchase of 20th Century Fox, to mobile-games developer Scopely.

Terms of the pact were not disclosed. Under the terms of the pact, Scopely is acquiring FoxNext Games Los Angeles, the game studio behind hit game “Marvel Strike Force,” and San Jose-based Cold Iron Studios, which FoxNext bought in 2018.

FoxNext Games Los Angeles released its debut title “Marvel Strike Force” in March 2018, and the role-playing game has become one of the top mobile games on iOS and Android, bringing in more than $150 million in its first year. The studio is also developing “Avatar: Pandora Rising,” a massively multiplayer strategy game based on James Cameron’s “Avatar” movie.

The acquisition does not include the separate portfolio of Fox intellectual property licensed games titles, which will continue to be a part of Disney’s licensed games business.

The deal is expected to close in the next few weeks. FoxNext Games has a little under 200 employees in its L.A. studio, said Tim O’Brien, chief revenue officer at Scopely.

“We have been hugely impressed with the incredible game the team at FoxNext Games has built with ‘Marvel Strike Force’ and can’t wait to see what more we can do together,” O’Brien said. He declined to discuss the purchase price but said, “It’s a great deal for Scopely and aligns perfectly with our M&A strategy.”

Following the close of the transaction, Scopely plans to sell Cold Iron Studios, O’Brien told Variety. That’s because Cold Iron is developing PC and console games, whereas Scopely is squarely focused on mobile games. About 50 employees work at Cold Iron, which is developing an “Alien” shooter game.

Disney has publicly said it doesn’t want to be in the game-studio business, in favor of a model of licensing its IP to other publishers and developers. Word surfaced last year that Disney was looking to sell FoxNext Games. In November 2018, Disney entered into a deal with mobile-games studio Jam City to develop titles based on Pixar and Walt Disney Animation franchises and shut down its games studio group in Glendale, Calif. (and some of those employees joined Jam City).

Scopely, founded in 2011, last fall announced a $200 million Series D funding round, bringing it to $458 million raised to date — and execs said they would be looking to buy up other game properties. The fundraise more than doubled Scopely’s valuation to approximately $1.7 billion.

Scopely says it has generated more than $1 billion in lifetime revenue. The company’s top-grossing games include “Star Trek Fleet Command” (created by Dublin-based DIGIT Game Studios, which Scopely bought last year), “Looney Tunes World of Mayhem,” “WWE Champions 2019,” “The Walking Dead: Road To Survival,” “Yahtzee With Buddies” and “Wheel of Fortune: Free Play.”

Upon completion of Scopely’s acquisition of FoxNext Games, Aaron Loeb, president of FoxNext Games, is set to join Scopely in a newly created executive role and Amir Rahimi, FoxNext Games senior VP and GM, will lead the FoxNext Games Los Angeles studio within Scopely as president, games.

Variety’s “Strictly Business” podcast spoke with Scopely CEO Walter Driver in 2019. Listen here:

“I’m extremely proud of what our talented team at FoxNext Games has built and accomplished in just a few years, and look forward to joining forces with the impressive team at Scopely, who have a well-deserved reputation as one of the preeminent companies in the free-to-play games arena,” Loeb said in a statement.

Rahimi added, “Both FoxNext Games and Scopely are committed to bringing beloved worlds to life through interactive gaming experiences designed to be played for years to come, and we believe this shared focus, coupled with our businesses’ unique strengths and Scopely’s expertise across multiple game genres, will lead to even greater success in the future.”

LionTree Advisors is acting as financial adviser to Disney, with Moelis & Co. acting as financial adviser to Scopely.

Источник: []
Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives

Free-to-play mobile RPG Marvel Strike Force now available for Android and iOS

Most mobile gamers who also happen to be fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe will be delighted to find out that there's a new game for them freely available on both Google Play and the iTunes Store. The name of this new mobile RPG is Marvel Strike Force, and it also happens to be the first title to be developed by FoxNet Games.

According to the Senior Vice President of Games & Innovation at Marvel Entertainment, Jay Ong, "MARVEL Strike Force perfectly demonstrates how we use games as a driver of the Marvel brand. Featuring a wholly original storyline that has gamers mixing and matching Super Heroes and Super Villains in never-before-seen alliances, this game is authentically Marvel and one of our most highly-anticipated projects this year."

Sadly, the view count of the official YouTube launch trailer does not look as it should for such a "highly-anticipated" project. However, it seems that the initial stream of 1-star ratings and bad reviews has finally stopped and, as more and more players join the fight, the overall Google Play rating of this game is also finally back above 4 out of 5 stars. 

Marvel Strike Force only has 88 MB in size and requires Android 4.4 KitKat or later. The version currently available on Google Play is 1.0.0, and it already passed the 100,000 downloads barrier. Available in 16 languages, the game is free to download and play, but those who want to speed up their progress or improve their characters can acquire one of the many in-game items with prices that go up to around US$100.

On the other hand, the game has a 4.8 out of 5 rating in the iTunes Store. The version for Apple hardware requires iOS 10.0 or later and has a size of almost 190 MB.

Top 10 Laptops
Multimedia, Budget Multimedia, Gaming, Budget Gaming, Lightweight Gaming, Business, Budget Office, Workstation, Subnotebooks, Ultrabooks, Chromebooks

under 300 USD/Euros, under 500 USD/Euros, 1.000 USD/Euros

Best Displays, for University Students

Top 10 Smartphones
Smartphones, Phablets, ≤5-inch, Camera SmartphonesNotebookcheck's Top 10 Smartphones under 160 Euros

Источник: []

What’s New in the Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives?

Screen Shot

System Requirements for Marvel Strike Force For PC Archives

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *