Medieval world Archives

Medieval world Archives

medieval world Archives

medieval world Archives

Archives and Archival Sensibilities in Medieval Arabic Historiography

In the year 1256, the first Mamluk sultan Aybak endowed a Sunni law college in old Cairo named al-Mu‘izziyya, an institution built using high-quality masonry acquired from the dilapidated Rawḍa Citadel on the Nile. A few decades later, a hadith scholar and historian named Ibn al-Furāt (d. 1405) wrote a book of history while working at this law college as a professor. In the later fifteenth century, the Mu‘izziyya college fell into disrepair and was eventually demolished; no trace of it remains today except infrequent references in medieval Arabic topographies.

“That fifteenth-century Arabic texts written on low quality paper radically outlived Mamluk buildings constructed in expensive materials should not, however, surprise the modern observer. For this is an outcome of the obsessive drive to preserve key texts of knowledge in medieval Islamic intellectual circles, a phenomenon we may term the medieval Arabic archival sensibility.In Writing History in the Medieval Arab World (I.B. Tauris, 2019) I provide a window into the written culture and history of the medieval Islamic world.”

The history book that Ibn al-Furāt wrote while based there, the multi-volume account popularly known as The History of Dynasties and Monarchs, survives to this day in his own two handwritten copies, enduring six centuries of historical ups and downs – despite never having been copied again as a whole text. That fifteenth-century Arabic texts written on low quality paper radically outlived Mamluk buildings constructed in expensive materials should not, however, surprise the modern observer. For this is an outcome of the obsessive drive to preserve key texts of knowledge in medieval Islamic intellectual circles, a phenomenon we may term the medieval Arabic archival sensibility.In Writing History in the Medieval Arab World (I.B. Tauris, 2019) I provide a window into the written culture and history of the medieval Islamic world.

State Documents and Their Survival

Not every community in the pre-modern Islamic past had archival repositories that survive intact to the present. State archives in particular are often singled out for being lost to posterity. For years, modern scholars laboured under the mistaken view that medieval Islamic communities did not produce documents in large numbers (compared, for example, to pre-modern European legal or ecclesiastical collections). Yet formal chancery documents were indeed produced by governments, but were also routinely de-acquisitioned, and the paper in them put into public circulation for re-use. Arabic manuscripts of the pre-printing age, as found today in libraries around the Islamic world and elsewhere, often contain documents or narratives written on paper previously used in chanceries or other institutions. Similarly, authors would often re-purpose personal documents to write out new texts. The problem is not that documents were not produced in substantial quantities, or even that they were not preserved. Rather, what we have is an intellectual culture in which a folio or sheet of paper – as a material object – could serve a variety of social and semantic functions that could change over time.

The ‘Absent’ Fatimid Archive

One Islamic dynasty whose written records have conventionally been regarded as lost is the Isma‘ili Shi‘i Fatimid dynasty, which ruled Egypt, North Africa and beyond in the tenth-twelfth centuries, and built the city of Cairo and its institutions. For the most part, neither their formal documents nor their narrative texts (books on history, biography, administrative arts) seem to survive in ways we might expect, as individual texts or document collections. On the other hand, the religious literature of the Fatimids is better preserved for having been transported for safekeeping to the Yemen in the 1060s, where this material would be shielded from the political violence that ensued during the Fatimids’ last decades in power.

“The Fatimids left behind a rich material culture. However, the history of Fatimid texts is more chequered, and modern scholarship has for many decades lamented an ‘absent’ Fatimid textual archive.”

The Fatimids left behind a rich material culture. However, the history of Fatimid texts is more chequered, and modern scholarship has for many decades lamented an ‘absent’ Fatimid textual archive. Meanwhile, the Fatimid archive of state documents survives partially in several ways, including in formal institutions such as the St. Catherine’s Monastery in Sinai, more serendipitously within the Cairo Geniza and as copies preserved in later literary sources.

These pathways to document preservation reveal a quite different – and more varied – life cycle for state documents, as well as a radically different archival sensibility, than the kind we see in pre-modern Europe. In medieval Cairo, the textual archive is dynamic rather than static. Recent research into the Cairo Geniza shows that once the formal archive released documents for re-use in domestic, commercial, literary, religious or other contexts, the original material could remain in circulation if new material was inscribed in gaps on existing texts.

“Recent research into the Cairo Geniza shows that once the formal archive released documents for re-use in domestic, commercial, literary, religious or other contexts, the original material could remain in circulation if new material was inscribed in gaps on existing texts.”
Indeed over-writing on paper is also attested elsewhere, such as in personal documents found in medieval Damascus. This kind of survival pattern is fairly common in the medieval Islamic world, and expresses one type of archival sensibility. Another kind of archival sensibility is visible in key works of Arabic historiography that incorporate older historical reports and documents including letters and state decrees, as powerfully illustrated by the document-laden chronicle of Ibn al-Furāt.

Fatimid Narrative Historiography

The Fatimids’ own production of history books was not prolific, at least not so when judged against the anachronistic expectations of modern scholarship. Yet more was written than is commonly assumed. A number of men within Fatimid Egypt, most of them servants of the state, wrote eyewitness accounts of Fatimid rule. The reports in these books are often preserved in later works of historiography. More than a dozen Fatimid-era chronicles are thus known from later history books. These include courtly chronicles by Ibn Zūlāq (d. 996) and al-Musabbiḥī (d. 1029), al-Quḍā‘ī’s (d. 1062) brief digest of world history named ‘Uyūn al-ma‘ārif and Ibn al-Ṣayrafī’s (d. 1147) unique account of the Fatimid vizierate. The copying of extracts from these books by later authors demonstrates that Arabic history-writing from Shi‘i Fatimid to Sunni Mamluk times is marked more by continuity than disruption. This continuity is sustained by historians in a way that debunks the notion of sectarian violence – deliberate neglect of texts, looting or burning of books, destroying libraries – that modern observers tend to expect would accompany the forcible wresting of political power from one dynasty by another, across a religious divide.

The seeming tragedy of the lost Fatimid archive had until recently been partly attributed to the well-known Sunni general Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn (d. 1193), who was reputed to have destroyed Fatimid libraries in their entirety. The Fatimids were bibliophiles who had collected books on a wide range of subjects well before their arrival as conquerors in Egypt. These extraordinary collections of literary gems, more than a million volumes, ordered by subject, were housed in several major libraries established in Cairo during the Fatimid era, including the well-known and publicly accessible Dār al-Ḥikma founded by Fatimid caliph al-Ḥākim in 1005. These are the library stocks that Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn allegedly destroyed on his assumption of power in Egypt in 1171. Recent studies have disproved this idea by demonstrating that the Fatimid libraries were dispersed, their contents sold over a number of years to brokers, or into private collections later found to be relatively intact, for example in Ayyubid Damascus.

Added to this, we find substantial textual evidence of the survival of many Fatimid books embedded within the composition of later chronicles. Re-use of texts of a different kind – here, historical reports valued for their capture and preservation of an otherwise inaccessible history – is another manifestation of the medieval Arabic archival sensibility.

Revisiting the ‘Archive’ as a Concept

“Fatimid history is thus preserved and commemorated largely in the inter-religious context of Mamluk historiography (Sunni authors looking back at a hugely important Shi‘i past) and these later works offer a variety of views on Fatimid legitimacy: many, like Ibn al-Furāt, presented this history without a discernible ‘sectarian’ lens.”
Fatimid history is thus preserved and commemorated largely in the inter-religious context of Mamluk historiography (Sunni authors looking back at a hugely important Shi‘i past) and these later works offer a variety of views on Fatimid legitimacy: many, like Ibn al-Furāt, presented this history without a discernible ‘sectarian’ lens. This professor at the Mu‘izziyya law college in Old Cairo procured dozens of original sources for Near Eastern history of the twelfth to fourteenth centuries, many of which have not survived independently. How do we make sense of this obsession to preserve the textual assets of the past? This question directs us towards the concept of the ‘archive,’ which has been radically revisited in recent years. A relatively newfound understanding of ‘archive’ acknowledges the contingent and subjective nature of all kinds of archives, and encourages scrutiny of the power dynamics embedded within conventional documentary archives: for example, the performance of identity, lineage, community, or confessional and political hierarchies within these writings designed to be passed on to posterity as well as serving practical uses in the present. Our revised understanding of ‘archive’ also – and crucially, in the context of history-writing – entails a move away from notion of the archive as a spatially fixed entity to an emphasis on archival practices. These archival practices include collecting, sifting and incorporating source materials, with the twin aims of preserving them and making them accessible to present and future generations of readers.

This last point is especially illuminating of the working methods of a historian like Ibn al-Furāt. One key way in which we see Ibn al-Furāt apply an archival sensibility is in the fact that he does not merely accumulate but carefully orders his sources, with explicit commentary on their value in a self-reflexive language that alerts his readers to his concern for creating a reliable register of textual witnesses to history. There is further self-reflexivity in the way he identifies particular sources: he tells us that he cites well-known author Ibn al-Athīr (d. 1233) via less well-known author Baybars (d. 1325). Would the average reader need to know this? On the other hand, learned readers would value this precision.

Archival Strategies in Mamluk Historiography

Archival practices are in evidence in all manner of post-Fatimid texts that help to preserve the Fatimid archive of narrative texts. In fact, Arabic historiography is denoted in medieval Arabic scholarship by the term ta’rīkh, the noun of the verb arrakha, to mark with a date, a common feature of archival practice as well as historiography. The archival mindset driving the production of various genres of texts in the medieval Islamic world has been traced in recent years by work on archivality in early Islamic Egypt, ‘Abbasid Baghdad and pre-Ottoman urban centres in Egypt and Syria. In this way,  the epistemological environment of formative and Middle Period Islamic centres of learning, including Ibn al-Furāt’s Cairo, are characterised by archival tendencies and an ‘archival fabric’ that leaves traces in both books of history and in society at large, if we consider how often books outlived buildings.

“Ibn al-Furāt curates his textual extracts in order to preserve knowledge of late Fatimid history, which extends the life cycles of his source materials and prevents their potential descent into obscurity.”

Ibn al-Furāt curates his textual extracts in order to preserve knowledge of late Fatimid history, which extends the life cycles of his source materials and prevents their potential descent into obscurity. As narrative texts of historiography are never formally de-acquisitioned – as state or other documents might be – they are liable to suffer neglect, and thence risk of oblivion. Text re-use is an omnipresent feature of medieval Islamicate archival culture in which narrative texts, like their documentary counterparts, do not simply ‘expire’ but remain living texts that enjoy afterlives where their re-use is deemed practical or desirable in fresh intellectual or social contexts.

As a manuscript and as a material object, Ibn al-Furāt’s chronicle is lucid in exhibiting physical signs of archivality: the use of red ink (rubrication) to mark the start and end of citations; adding isikhrāj (or ta‘qībāt, catchwords) on pages to ensure correct order of folios; providing headings and subheadings to indicate change of topic or sub-genre; the addition of explanatory glosses within margins; and the alphabetization of obituary notices. Knowledge must be preserved, but also ordered for coherence, in this archival mindset.

The Intertextual Mamluk Archive

“The seemingly absent or erased Fatimid archive is revealed by Ibn al-Furāt’s book to have been better preserved than is often appreciated, not least through the intertextual composition of Mamluk archives of history.”
The seemingly absent or erased Fatimid archive is revealed by Ibn al-Furāt’s book to have been better preserved than is often appreciated, not least through the intertextual composition of Mamluk archives of history. This ‘intertextuality’ means acquiring, extracting and citing earlier sources, and Ibn al-Furāt clearly enjoyed a special talent for finding and exploiting a wide variety of textual witnesses for each period he wrote about. Like his famous contemporary Ibn Khaldūn in the latter’s major book of history, Ibn al-Furāt brings together not just genres but widely differing religious perspectives, including Christian ones. Knowledge is valued for its own sake in the chronicle as archive, often in defiance of an author’s own religious or political pre-commitments.

The long-term dividends of looking more deeply into the archival sensibilities that shaped the writing of chronicles in the medieval Islamic world include a clearer and more specialised understanding of why history was written and by which methods. It also integrates the writing of history within a wider archival culture that allows us to clarify the intertextuality of medieval Arabic scholarly writing, as authors in various genres co-contributed to a larger archive of knowledge to be valued by present and future readers. The historian as an archivist did not typically limit himself (and it was usually a ‘he’) to memorialising historical knowledge from one type of source, but would rather cast his net widely before evaluating and then incorporating sources. Finally, the benefits of the archival method of history writing were felt not just by authors who built their reputations on this kind of effort, but also by modern scholars who may no longer be able to step into the physical institutions of knowledge production, but happily are able to handle and read the bookish monuments of that endeavor even today.


Fozia Bora is Lecturer in Middle Eastern History and Islamic History at the University of Leeds. She took her undergraduate and postgraduate degrees at the University of Oxford, and worked as a journalist before returning to academic life. Her monograph Writing History in the Medieval Islamic World – The Value of Chronicles as Archives was published by I B Tauris in June 2019. Her previous article ‘Did Ṣalāḥ al-Dīn Destroy the Fatimids’ Books? An Historiographical Enquiry’ was awarded the Royal Asiatic Society’s Staunton Prize for ‘outstanding work by an early career scholar’.

Fozia is Islam consultant for the Oxford English Dictionary (third edition), a contributor to the Encyclopaedia of Islam 3 and a Council Member of the British Association of Islamic Studies. She lives with her partner, children and cats in the beautiful Yorkshire Dales and tweets at Islamicate History (@FoziaBora).


Источник: []
, medieval world Archives
Skip to main content

Links to collections

  • Avalon Project
    Digital documents relevant to the fields of law, history, economics, politics, diplomacy and government from ancient times to the 21st century.
  • Daily Life Through History
    Medieval World section includes articles about domestic life, economic life, intellectual life, material life, political life, recreational life and religious life. Includes an historical overview as well as primary sources.
  • De Re Militari
    Primary (and secondary) sources on medieval and renaissance military history. Includes the Crusades, Hundred Years' War, Anglo-Norman Warfare, and the Vikings and Norse. [Note: temporarily unavailable March 2012, but links to an archived site]
  • Empire Online
    A major collection of scanned texts relating to empire studies, divided into 5 sections: Cultural Contacts 1492-1969; Empire Writing/the Literature of Empire; The Visible Empire; Religion; and Race, class, imperialism and colonialism 1607-2007.
  • English Medieval Legal Documents A.D. 600-A.D 1535
    A "collaborative database on the published sources of English medieval legal documents." Links to online sources are provided when available.
  • Epistolae: Medieval Women's Letters
    "Epistolæ is a collection of letters to and from women in the Middle Ages, from the 4th to the 13th century. The letters, written in Latin, are linked to the names of the women involved, with English translations and, where available, biographical sketches of the women and some description of the subject matter or the historic context of the letter."
  • EuroDocs: History of Medieval and Renaissance Europe
    Subset of the larger EuroDocs site, focusing on the medieval period.
  • Florilegium Urbanum
    Presents a selection of primary source texts illustrative of various aspects of medieval urban life. Texts are grouped under four headings: community, economy, government and lifecycle.
  • Guide to Early Church Documents
    Canonical information, apostolic fathers, texts, creeds and canons, and other miscelleaneous texts related to the development of the early Christian church.
  • Internet History Sourcebooks
    This is the place to start. Huge collections of well-organized primary texts, divided into: Ancient History, East Asian History, Global History, History of Science, Indian History, Jewish History, Medieval History, and Women's History
  • Internet Sacred Text Archive
    Archive of primary texts relating to all major world religions and many other spiritual practices, including all major scriptures.
  • Islamic Medical Manuscripts
    Here you can learn about Islamic medicine and science during the Middle Ages and the important role it played in the history of Europe.
  • Labyrinth: Resources for Medieval Studies
    Provides subject-oriented links to other websites offering primary sources of the medieval period.
  • The Medieval and Classical Literature Library
    A collection of some of the most important literary works of Classical and Medieval civilization. Browse by author/title/genre/language.
  • Medieval and Early Modern Manuscripts Collection
    This is a work in progress from the University of Texas at Austin. When complete, the database will provide full digital access to 215 manuscripts dating from the 11th to 17th centuries. As of May 2010, 27 of these are viewable. The database offers searching and browsing capabilities.
  • Medieval Handbooks of Penance
    "The documents translated in this book were employed in administering a religious discipline to our forefathers during their transition from paganism to Christianity and from barbarism to civilization."
  • Medieval History Texts in Translation
    Translated texts of the Pontificate of Gregory VII; the Crusades; the Norman Kingdom of Sicily; and the Chronicle of St. Clement, Casauria. From the University of Leeds.
  • Medieval Trade in the Mediterranean World
    Documents dealing with all aspects of commerce in the Mediterranean.
  • Monastic Matrix
    Excellent site dedicated to the study of women's religious communities from 400 to 1600CE. Includes a separate section of primary sources, which can be browsed by title/author/community/region/century. Search function also available.
  • The Orb: Online Reference Book for Medieval Studies
    Includes translations of medieval documents, as well as many links to full-text or excerpted primary sources.
  • Primary Source Material in Religion and Politics
    Primary source documents on issues relating to the interaction of religion and politics, categorized by era from ancient times to the present. Note: site appears unavailable; see archived website.
  • Silk Road Narratives
    Historical texts and maps that "explore cultural interaction across Eurasia from the beginning of the Common Era (A. D.) to the Seventeenth Century."
  • TEAMS Middle English Texts
    Collection of medieval literature.
  • Travels of Marco Polo
    An account of Polo's travels to Asia in the late 13th century.
  • University Records and Life in the Middle Ages
    Presents translated documents that illustrate the history of the university during the 12th-17th centuries.
  • Women and Writing in Medieval Europe: a Sourcebook
    Presents texts by, for or about medieval women. Book chapters include: marriage; love, sex and friendship; motherhood and work; women and Christianity; women and power; education and knowledge; women and the arts.
  • World Digital Library: Browse by Time
    Collection of manuscripts, books and visual resources. Select a date range of interest, then use limiters to focus search on a specific geography, date range, topic or type of resource.
Источник: []
medieval world Archives


A Three-day Voyage into the Medieval Unread and Unreadable: from its Micro- to Macrocosms, & the Promise for Future Medieval Scholarship


 Registration is now closed.

Are you registered, and need the access details for the registrants' conference area (includes instant access to all videos, the pre-/post conference forum, and to the live events themselves on Zoom)? Please email us at and we will reply promptly. 


Full programme below (and downloadable at )


This year, medieval primary materials have become physically inaccessible to researchers – and their archives literally dark – to a degree unknown since medieval studies first developed. And yet 2020 also caps a decade of huge growth in online images, scholarship and other data for such sources, albeit still only for a tiny fraction of the whole. This burgeoning digital availability is already fuelling a great new ambition of medieval studies: to scan, transcribe and assemble all of its materials, enabling thereby a range of transformative new disciplines and insights.

Dark Archives 20/20 is therefore delighted to welcome dozens of experts, from around the world, to address a basic challenge underscored by our current physical isolation: If we no longer have access to the original sources, only to (overwhelmingly digital) copies, what of the medieval do we still possess, & what more might we thereby uncover?

On Day 1 - 'Macrocosms' - we survey the still-unmapped vastness of the medieval graphosphere - the collectivity of its written materials, extant (read and unread) and destroyed, from Nordic runes to originally Greek texts surviving solely in Syriac translations. How can we quantify the destroyed? What fraction of medieval writing does our current scholarship therefore inhabit, and how did this come to be?

On Day 2 - 'Microcosms' -  we turn to exploring the inner worlds of the medieval written artefact. Which of its facets can or indeed can only be represented digitally? Participants will explore the scope of the latest technologies, from CT scanning, to mass machine transcription of written contents, to protein and DNA analysis. On the other hand, what facets can never be represented digitally? Are there dangers in researching medieval manuscripts in the absence of the physical originals?

On Days 2 & 3 - '"Massive, Open, Online" - the Future?' - we look to the opportunities and challenges that such endeavours pose for medieval studies. Is the future Archive to be an assemblage of the increasingly vast collaborative scanning projects of the world's repositories, or something more? What is the potential of the new scholarly disciplines that are resulting, or might do so - from 'distant reading' to crowd-sourcing? What skill sets will medieval studies require?

Make Medieval History

To bear fruit, however, these enormous opportunities will require hugely increased participation and collaboration in medieval studies. Whether or not you are delivering a paper, come and help us realise this future at Dark Archives 20/20:

• participate in the live question-and-answer sessions that will accompany each panel. We will be releasing recordings of talks the themselves to registered participants several days ahead of the conference, precisely to maximise the scope for live discussion and audience involvement on the day, wherever you are in the world.

• contribute to three extended open debates that will take place during the conference: on ‘Bias’, ‘The Future Archive’, and ‘The Future of Scholarship’.

• meet and network with medievalists from all backgrounds - from palaeographers to computer scientists - in one of the multiple side-sessions and break-out rooms that will be operate throughout the conference.


Full Programme

A Note on Conference Organisation

We are excited to be bringing together dozens of medievalist speakers, respondents and other participants at Dark Archives 20/20, from Shaanxi to California. In order to maximise live participation for all in the debates, wherever you are in the world, the conference is organised along the following lines:

  • All presentations are pre-recorded. As well as being streamed on their respective days during the conference itself, the talks will be released to registered participants in view-on-demand format five days ahead, via, on 3rd September 2020; on that date we will also be opening a forum to allow registered participants to send possible questions for discussion at the conference itself - or ask questions via Twitter with the #darkarchives hashtag.
  • All Zoom discussion sessions, including question-and-answer sessions with speakers, will be held live and in plenary format, in the afternoons and evenings British Summer Time.
  • Multiple moderated Zoom break-out rooms will also operate throughout the conference, to allow continued socialising and Dark Archives 20/20  discussion.

* To get the most from Dark Archives 20/20, we strongly recommend that you digest the wealth of presentations at your leisure between 3rd and 8th September *

General registration will remain open until 6th September 2020


Part One:  Macrocosms
(Tuesday 8th September)

Just how big is the world of medieval writing (extant, whether read or unread, and destroyed), how is it connected and what is it made of? How and why should we map it? How has our current ‘active archive’ come to include the materials that it does, and not others?

Talks (released as view-on-demand from 3rd September)

(Keynote: also streamed on 8th September, 1.15pm BST)

Keynote Address: Showing the Medieval and Early Modern World as it Actually Was: the expansion of the work of HMML (the Hill Museum & Library) beyond monastic libraries in Europe to global preservation of handwritten heritage

Columba Stewart (Hill Museum and Manuscript Library) @columbastewart


Loss and Dispersal (also streamed on 8th September, 10.30am-12.45pm BST)

The Lost Patriarchs Project: discovering Greek patristics in the medieval Latin tradition

Scott Bruce (Fordham University) @xuthalofthedusk

Fragments and Reconstructions: the written traces of polyphonic liturgical music in medieval Worcester and beyond

Karen Desmond (Brandeis University) @demontibus

The Elusive Archives of Livonia

Anastasija Ropa, Edgar Rops (LASE Latvia)

Using Manuscript Fragments to Map Lived Religion: the case of the cults of saints in medieval Sweden

Sarah Elis-Nilsson (Linnaeus University and Lund University) @ellisnilsson

Estimating the Loss of Medieval Literature with an Unseen Species Model from Ecodiversity

Mike Kestemont (Antwerp University) @Mike_Kestemont and Folgert Karsdorp (KNAW: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences)

Veiled Manuscripts: European female mystics’ writing in medieval Castile's monastic libraries

Pablo Acosta-García (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf) @PabloAcostaGarc


Inaccessibility and Bias (also streamed on 8th September, 10.30am-12.45pm BST)

The Dark Archive and the Silent Book: histories of access

Stacie Vos (University of San Diego) @stacvos

Inaccessible and Inconvenient Archives at the Turn of the Century

Genevieve McNutt (Edinburgh University)

Medieval Graffiti

Matthew Champion (Norfolk Graffiti Survey) @mjc_associates

Book Ciphers and the Medieval Unreadable

Anna Dorofeeva (Durham University) @LitteraCarolina

Digitalization and Practicalities of Medieval English Studies in China

Yating Zhang (Shaanxi Normal University)

Plenary and Live Sessions (8th September, 1.15pm-8.00pm BST)


Keynote Address (stream from 1.15pm; live q&a session from c. 2pm)

Columba Stewart (Hill Museum and Manuscript Library)

Chair: Anthony J. Lappin@anthonyjlappin





Debate: Mapping the Medieval Graphosphere: a new science?

Chair: Elizabeth Solopova (University of Oxford). Participants: Columba Stewart, Teresa Webber (University of Cambridge), Krista Murchison (University of Leiden), ‘Loss and Dispersal’ speakers, and others.





Debate: Inaccessibility and Bias

Chair: Michael G. Sargent (City University of New York). Participants: Columba Stewart, Miri Rubin (QMUL) @mirierubin, Maja Kominko (Aliph Foundation), ‘Inaccessibility and Bias’ speakers, and others.





#PolonskyGerman #BloggingMSS Presentations

Organisers: Andrew Dunning @anjdunning, Henrike Lähnemann @HLaehnemann, Matthew Holford @MatthewHolford, Tuija Ainonen @AinonenT (Oxford)





Part Two: Microcosms
(Wednesday 9th September)

How far is it the case that the facets of the medieval written artefact can, cannot or can only be captured digitally?

Talks (released as view-on-demand from 3rd September; also streamed on 9th September, 8.30am-1.30pm BST)

Keynote Address: The Opportunities (and Limits) of Lockdown Digital Fragmentology

Lisa Fagin Davis (Medieval Academy of America) @lisafdavis


The Book, The Whole Book, and Nothing But the... Digital Surrogate

Stewart Brookes (University of Oxford) @stewart_brookes

Let there be Light: The holy digitised artefact

Keri Thomas@keri_thomas

Found Within: discovery and complex objects

Benjamin L. Albritton (Stanford University) @bla222

Reading the Invisible: can biocodicology help interpret the history of a manuscript?

Sarah Fiddyment (Cambridge University) @DrSFiddyment

How to Read the Unreadable? Non-Invasive digitization of cultural heritage


Vincent Christlein @v_christlein and Daniel Stromer @daniel_stromer (Friedrich-Alexander University)

Reading the Unread: parchment damage in a fifteenth century Netherlandish prayer book

Sophie Clayton (University of Leeds) @sophieclayton97

Rethinking the abbreviation: questions and challenges of machine reading medieval scripta

Estelle Guéville (Louvre Abu Dhabi) &
David Joseph Wrisley (NYU Abu Dhabi) @DJWrisley

How Much of a Manuscript is a Digitized Manuscript?

Cornelis van Lit (Utrecht University) @LWCvL

Beyond the Veil: manuscript curtains and the reading experience, medieval and modern

Henry Ravenhall (KCL) @HenryRavenhall

Blast from the Past and Back to the Future: manuscripts and digitisation

Luise Morawetz (SAW Leipzig) @LuiseMorawetz, Natascha Domeisen @NDomeisen (Oxford), Carolin Gluchowski (Fribourg), Lena Vosding (Oxford)

Plenary and Live Sessions I (9th September, 1.15pm-5.30pm BST)


Keynote Address (stream from 1.30pm; live q&a session from c. 2.15pm)

Lisa Fagin Davis (Medieval Academy of America) @lisafdavis





Debate: The Whole Book?

Chair: Lisa Fagin Davis. Participants: ‘Microcosms’ speakers, and others.





Part Three (a): Massive, Open, Online … the Future Archive?
(Wednesday 9th September)

What challenges and opportunities would the answers to Parts One and Two open for the future of the Archive and of scholarship?

Talks (released as view-on-demand from 3rd September; streamed on 9th September, 9.30am-1pm BST)

The Curator in the Machine: balancing accessibility and experience in digitizing the Islamic manuscript collection of the National Library of Israel

Samuel Thrope (National Library of Israel) @SamuelThrope

(Re)collecting the Archive: recovering medieval manuscripts destroyed During WWII

Krista Murchison (University of Leiden) @drkmurch

There and Back Again with 2022: bringing Dublin's lost records back from Westminster

Elizabeth Biggs (University of Durham), Paul Dryburgh (The National Archives), Lynn Killgallon (TCD) @pablodiablo74, @ElizabethCBiggs

Shedding Light on Middle High German Hymn Translations

Franziska Lallinger & Pavlina Kulagina (Humboldt University)

Preserving the Materiality of the Digital: data management and sustainability in the context of a digital edition of L’histoire ancienne jusqu’à César

Natasha Romanova (KCL)

‘Back up soon’: toward an infrastructural understanding of digital archives and digital failureThomas White (University of Oxford) @___TomWhite___

Medieval Spanish Manuscripts, Modern Digital Repositories: the future of scholarly-curated thematic collections supported via public engagement

Roger L. Martínez-Dávila, with Mary Rupp (University of Colorado) @rogerlmartinez
Manuscript Catalogues: unread and unreadableMichelle Warren (Dartmouth College) @MichelleRWarren


Plenary and Live Sessions II (9th September, 6.00pm-10.15pm BST)


Debate: The Future Archive

Chair: Suzanne Paul (Cambridge University) @suzpaul. Participants: Elaine Treharne (Stanford),Ben Albritton (Stanford), ‘Future Archive’ speakers, and others.  





Compline from the Crypt

St Edmund Hall Chapel Choir and friends


Part Three (b): Massive, Open, Online … the Future of Scholarship?
(Thursday 10th September)

Talks (released as view-on-demand from 3rd September; also streamed on 10th September, 9.30am-1.30pm BST)

Keynote Address: Seeing and Being Seen: digital manuscripts and their viewers

Elaine Treharne (Stanford University) @ETreharne


Crowdsourcing in a Time of Data Protection and Covid-19: the case study of Crowdmap-the-Crusades

Emma Goodwin (University of Oxford) @dhAHRC

Medieval Digital Visionary Women: editing the wiki ‘Catalogue of Living Saints’

Rebeca Sanmartin Bastida (Complutense University of Madrid)   Pablo Acosta-García (Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf) @PabloAcostaGarc

The Changing Paradigms of the Digital Production and Communication of Medieval Scholarship: some reflections on openness

Ulrike Wuttke (University of Potsdam) @UWuttke

Using Semantic Textual Encoding to Support the Navigation and Analysis of Medieval Texts

Zoe Bartliff (University of Glasgow) @ZBartliff

From the Library of Babel to Arcologies of Information

Michael G. Sargent (City University of New York)


Plenary and Live Sessions (10th September, 3pm-9.15pm BST)


Keynote Address (stream from 3pm; live q&a session from c. 3.45pm)

Elaine Treharne (Stanford University) @ETreharne

Chair: Stephen Pink @darkarchives





Debate: The Future of Scholarship

Chair: Peter Frankopan (University of Oxford) @peterfrankopan Participants: Elaine Treharne, ‘Future of Scholarship’ speakers, Jane Taylor (Durham), Damon Wischik (Cambridge University / Turing Institute), Mike Kestemont (Antwerp), Justin Stover (Oxford), and others.





Discussion: Funders' Perspectives

Chair: Peter Frankopan @peterfrankopan Participants: Marc Polonsky (Polonsky Foundation), Simon Chaplin (Arcadia Fund) @SDJChaplin, Daniel Reid (Whiting Foundation) @DPReid, and others.


#PolonskyGerman #BloggingMSS Prize: Laudationes and Award Ceremony

Organisers: Andrew Dunning, Henrike Lähnemann, Matthew Holford, Tuija Ainonen


Источник: []

What’s New in the medieval world Archives?

Screen Shot

System Requirements for Medieval world Archives

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *